#Introvert a teenager simulator endings how to

Some explorers discover continents, others spend their lives perfectly mapping one or two small islands, or just a single river valley or cove. Every great writer can be hailed as an explorer вЂ“ no less extraordinary than a Magellan or Cook вЂ“ into new, hitherto mysterious corners of the self. The more writers we read, the better grows our understanding of our own minds. For example, once we have read Proust, and are then abandoned by a lover who has kindly droned on about their need to spend вЂa little more time on their ownвЂ™ because they are вЂso messed upвЂ™, we will benefit from seeing the dynamic a bit more clearly, thanks to ProustвЂ™s line: вЂњWhen two people part it is the one who is not in love who makes the tender speeches.вЂќ The clarity wonвЂ™t make the lover return but it will do the next best thing, help us to feel less confused by, and alone with, the misery of being ditched. Great authors turn the vague into theВ clear. When Proust compares literature to вЂa kind of optical instrumentвЂ™, what he means is that it is a high-tech machine that helps us to focus what we understand of ourselves and others around us.

#Introvert a teenager simulator endings how to

We just never knew how to condense our mental mulch into something this elegant.

We are likely to smile in immediate recognition. вЂ To say that one never flirts is in itself a form of flirtation.вЂ™ вЂThere are some people who would never have fallen in love, if they had not heard there was such a thing.вЂ™ ItвЂ™s an idea closely followed by the equally penetrating: вЂWe all have strength enough to bear the misfortunes of others.вЂ™ Take, for example, the self-knowledge offered by one ProustвЂ™s favourite writers, the 17th-century philosopher, Le Duc de La Rochefoucauld, the author of a slim volume of aphorisms known as the Maxims: We might wonder how on earth the author could have known certain deeply personal things about us, ideas that normally fracture in our clumsy fingers when we try to take hold of them, but that are here perfectly preserved and illuminated. In some of the best works of culture, we have an overwhelming impression of coming across orphaned bits of ourselves, evoked with rare crispness and tenacity. And the recognition by the reader in his own self of what the book says is the proof of its veracity.вЂќ The writerвЂ™s work is merely a kind of optical instrument which he offers to the reader to enable him to discern what, without this book, he would perhaps never have experienced in himself. вЂњIn reality, every reader is, while he is reading, the reader of his own self. His novel wasnвЂ™t really about these distinctly remote-sounding people, it was about someone closer to home, you: But towards the end of his novel, he made a remarkable claim. Marcel Proust wrote a long novel about some aristocratic and high bourgeois characters living in early 20th-century France. Here literature can help, because in many cases, it knows us better than we know ourselves and can provide us with an account, more accurate than any we might have been capable of, of what is likely to be going on in our minds. We make a lot of mistakes because of our pervasive self-ignorance. One side of the mind frequently has no clear picture of what the other happens to be upset about, anxious around or looking forward to. One of the more frustrating, yet fundamental, things about being human is that we canвЂ™t understand ourselves very well.